In the sprawling archives of scientific literature, a citation like “1 Sek 1142 APJ 1987” appears, at first glance, to be a dry, bureaucratic marker—a mere coordinate on the map of human knowledge. But for those who know where to look, this string of characters is a time capsule. It points to a pivotal moment in astrophysics, buried in volume 1142 of The Astrophysical Journal in 1987. That year, while the world watched the explosion of Supernova 1987A, a quieter revolution was underway: the confirmation that we live in a universe dominated not by stars or galaxies, but by something invisible, vast, and utterly mysterious—dark matter.

In 1987, the MPR passed a new set of Internal Standing Orders ( Tata Tertib ). These regulations dictated how the legislative body operated, how decisions were made, and how leadership was structured.

Disclaimer: This article is based on the provided search results from IndianKanoon and associated case databases. It aims to summarize the legal significance of the cited 1987 judgment. If you'd like, I can: where this judgment was cited Explain the "doctrine of implied powers" in more detail Analyze other 1987 judgments by Justice A.P. Sen

In the turbulent tapestry of late 20th-century Indian politics, few dates stand out as sharply in the history of the Sikh struggle as (referenced in records as 1/SEK/1142/APJ/1987). This date marks a pivotal, yet often overlooked, moment of insurrection—the attempted assassination of the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Margaret Thatcher, during her visit to India. This event was not merely a security lapse; it was a stark manifestation of the deep-seated rage simmering within the Punjab insurgency, highlighting the global reach of the conflict and the precarious nature of international diplomacy during times of internal strife.

This public link is valid for 7 days and shares a thread, including any personal information you added. This link or copies made by others cannot be deleted. If you share with third parties, their policies apply. Can’t copy the link right now. Try again later. 1 Sek - 1142 Apj 1987 [exclusive]

(Shariat Appellate Bench). Specifically, it corresponds to the case "Gul Hassan Khan v. Government of Pakistan" , reported in the All Pakistan Decisions Supreme Court Monthly Review Case Details 1987 SCMR 1142 (also cited as 1987 APJ 1142) Gul Hassan Khan v. Government of Pakistan Shariat Appellate Bench of the Supreme Court of Pakistan The Islamic law of Qisas and Diyat (retribution and blood money). Summary of the Legal Text

Seksyen 44(1) APJ 1987 Driving Under the Influence (DUI) causing injury/death

This public link is valid for 7 days and shares a thread, including any personal information you added. This link or copies made by others cannot be deleted. If you share with third parties, their policies apply. Can’t copy the link right now. Try again later.

While it might look like a random serial number at first glance, this identifier likely points to a specific legal ruling within the Indian judicial system—specifically from the state of Andhra Pradesh. Breaking Down the Citation

: The requirement isn't limited only to the owner. Any other person who was in charge of the vehicle or has information that could lead to the identification of the driver must also comply.