The original 2004-2006 broadcasts are archived on Radio France’s website. However, many are split into two halves (because of radio news breaks).
Scientists and theorists who rejected the concept of the soul entirely, looking at human behavior through biology, chemistry, and environment. Why "La Contre-Histoire" Matters Today
, Onfray seeks to "demythologize" a thinker he believes has held a near-monopoly on the Western understanding of the mind. He advocates for a return to materialist psychology The original 2004-2006 broadcasts are archived on Radio
If this description has piqued your interest, you'll want to know where you can find the "full" audio. Fortunately, there are several legal and high-quality avenues available:
Before examining Volume 16, one must understand Onfray’s premise. Traditional philosophy (from Plato to Kant to Hegel) is, in his view, an "idealistic lie"—a history written by the victors (clerics, academics, and spiritualists). Onfray’s counter-history does not focus on abstract essences or transcendent truths. Instead, he champions the materialists , hedonists , atomists , and skeptics . Why "La Contre-Histoire" Matters Today , Onfray seeks
He critiques the "magic" causality of the divan (the couch) and characterizes Freud's reported clinical successes as "paper healings".
Onfray structures this volume around the concept of the "Ultra-Reactionary." Unlike standard conservative thinkers who wish to slow down progress, these thinkers demand a complete reversal—a return to a pre-Revolutionary, pre-Enlightenment world order defined by the authority of the Church and the Monarchy. Traditional philosophy (from Plato to Kant to Hegel)
The and backlash this volume caused in French intellectual circles.